On Symphonies
May 26, 2008 at 6:03 pm (Uncategorized)
It is a Sunday, a day where my family and I often rest in the mornings, take a nap in the afternoon—we generally try to take a Sabbath from the crazy schedule of the rest of the week.
This afternoon was one of those times—they boys were down, my wife and I had tried our hand at the Sunday crossword, and she decided to go upstairs and take a nap. Sleep sounded good to me too, but I don’t nap well upstairs in bed. It feels too forced or something. My version of a luxurious nap is to lie on the couch, the TV tuned to an afternoon baseball game, and allow the sound of the crowd and commentators to lull me to sleep like a young child.
It may sound silly but it is one of life’s luxuries, if you ask me!
Today’s routine went a little differently, however.
I got myself situated on the couch, grabbed the remote to turn on the game, and found that whatever channel the TV was left on was now broadcasting a symphony—Shubert’s 9th, to be exact.
I was mesmerized.
I had planned on switching straight to the game, but after the first few notes, I just sat there, watching and listening. I had heard that piece many times before, but this time, it was different. I seemed to notice things that I had never heard before, more likely than not due to the camera work that focused on specific instruments, one at a time, allowing me to “hear” more clearly each instrument’s individual influence on the piece.
I found myself with tears streaming down my face as the music would reach a crescendo, then quiet down, only to hit another peak moments later. I noticed particular threads of music teasing the score, bouncing from the flutes to the violins, back to the flutes, and then alluded to by the French horns.
It was absolutely phenomenal.
And when you consider the number of musicians all playing in such accord, it was remarkable. All eyes of everyone in the orchestra, fixed on the conductor, following his lead through the score.
At times the strings would “rest”, sitting quietly while the horns and percussion took the stage. At other times, the horns would return the favor, and allow the attention to be on the violins and cellos. Still at other times, common themes would dance from section to section, a musical dialogue from one end of the orchestra to the other.
All notes were held together by a common musical story line, each section having the opportunity to add its unique sound to the mix. Sometimes minutes would go by without the story surfacing, but it would show up, faithfully, in one form or another, whether a subtle bass line, a soothing horn, or the show-stealing violins.
It all worked.
No ego, no horns trying to steal the limelight from the violas, no timpani being hit too loudly so as to drown out the oboes. It all worked.
I think the reason it brought me to tears was because a symphony can be such a metaphor for life. Sometimes, I feel like my limited perspective places me in the chair of the second violin, right at the point of a musical rest. It seems like everybody else in the orchestra is getting a chance to play but me. I just have to sit and watch.
At other times, I feel like my role is that of the bass—I get to play a bit, but just slow, low notes, while the violins play furiously and attract all the attention. Sometimes still I feel like the oboe—slightly abrasive in my role, standing out as different from the others.
But in watching this symphony from the perspective of the audience, I realized that all pieces worked together for the common good of the score. That without the second violin resting, it would not have given the other instruments their proper place in the ears of the audience. Without the bass keeping the musical theme, there would be no dancing around for the other parts, for they would have lost their way. Without the oboe’s sometime abrasive tones, the cellos would never sound so soothing.
That in order for the symphony to work, every instrument was required to yield to the other, allowing them to shine, while at the same time yielding to the conductor, allowing him to manage the various pieces.
It was a picture of literal harmony—all pieces working individually, creating a masterpiece in their unity.
Ah how I wish we could be more like a symphony in our approach to life. How I wish so desperately that I would be more accepting of my role, whatever that role may be. How I so fervently wish that I could be comfortable with the “instrument” I was made to be, without comparing myself to the other instruments in the orchestra.
How I wish that, when it was my time to play a little louder while the others rested, that I would do so with controlled enthusiasm, allowing not only my individualism to show, but also being aware of the musical theme, allowing myself to dance around the story line.
And how I wish we could follow the conductor’s baton, all mutually submitting to each other, everyone aware that it takes the whole part to succeed.
That the beauty of a symphony is that it is made up of individuals.
Individuals who sometimes get to play solos, who at other times get to rest, still others who maintain the thematic elements written into the score.
Individuals who, together, are capable of such beauty, of such transcendent unity, that we bring Life itself into tears of marvel, tears of astonishment, tears that have no other way of expressing themselves than to stand in ovation, loudly cheering “bravo” for the orchestra, while the conductor stands by, his smile revealing the pride of a father, himself applauding a job well done…